Bryan Henry

@dtolnay I'm interested in contributing support for static member functions. There's a few different design possibilities that have been discussed, summarized below. I'd like to agree on one with you...

Hrm, I suppose I could use that to implement my own proc-macro with the hacky “generate other files in a proc-macro” approach above. Is autocxx doing something like that today?

Regarding an improved error message...it doesn't seem like `Box` receivers are supported currently? Did you intend to mention something else for the "if ownership needs to be transferred" case, or...

+1, I have a similar situation as jdumas@ above, though a more complex case (involving generated code for a Rust/C++ FFI using https://github.com/dtolnay/cxx), where the generated header happens to use...

Also, it's easy enough for me to just swap out that logic in validateSettings for my own script...I'm mainly filing this for the benefit of others (and for myself in...

Yep I can send one, just been busy this week.

A documentation change for this was landed in https://github.com/esphome/esphome-docs/pull/2126, before the change itself landed. Can you please back out the premature documentation change? As of today the documentation states that...