Alexander Tsybulsky

Results 223 comments of Alexander Tsybulsky

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15635498/154336106-02b8d55b-811b-4d74-adb7-0b6b7ad440e5.png) Hmmm ...??? 1) tags show changed categories (or just file extensions ... but I'd emphasize UTs) 2) Also not bad with current row hover, though see 5 ... 3)...

Imho, not that I'm a big fun of this particular improvement :( ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15635498/155399508-85a7fe46-3b85-403c-bb50-109cb368cea0.png) - (1) Issue with packages, probably needs some more spacing - (2) changed by looks very tight,...

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15635498/163215141-63e2f6a8-0ba7-496c-a83a-847f09e740ee.png) what about: - status not clickable - instead, click on object name would show diffs (which is also hinted in column name) - the "open tool" command is displayed...

... on the other hand, if the repo view and stage is the same UI, then icon may be dynamically replaced by checkbox which will visually highlight the change of...

arrows: ... interesting, but on the other hand they are small (to click) and textless (thus unclear) **imho** ... and will be far from object name. The links near the...

P.P.P.P.S And maybe mark modified line with the border instead of highlight to avoid double highlight (on hover) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15635498/164464515-1d7c08bb-0ece-465e-891f-f19bc8fa73f4.png) `border-left: 4px solid #e4b80a;`

> I'm not a fan of "features on hover" Why ? :) My arguments are: - there are secondary commands - if they are always displayed, they clutter the view...

https://accessuse.eu/en/Content-hover-focus.html: well this particular one is a bit arguable. - the commands are not "popup content", they are compact and shown very very close to the pointer area - they...

- added a vote to slack channel to collect some stats, let's try to make a more educated decision :) - icons: it's OK to assign some functions to icon...

Imho, we should be more specific with the context. Does abapGit have public API ? which is supposed to be stable? afaik, the answer is no. Maybe we should look...