satscottfoster
satscottfoster
How do I vote for this?
I agree with @schristoff-du because this sounds like a lot of work to satisfy situations which can easily be avoided. Full(ish) backwards compatibility seems like a lot of time create...
Please look at the names of your binaries on your releases. You have two binaries with the same name starting at v1.2.3. The last release with correct names is v1.2.2....
Looks like you all eliminated dumb-init_1.#.#_amd64 because it's the same thing as dumb-init_1.#.#_x86_64? This change broke our code. Using two names for the same arch, dumb-init_1.#.#_amd64.deb and dumb-init_1.#.#_x86_64, is confusing.