Stefan Appelhoff
Stefan Appelhoff
I think with [BIDS-URIs](https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/02-common-principles.html#bids-uri) this is possible, so the dataset(s) in question should be updated to make use of BIDS-URIs, WDYT?
(NOTE: I'll cross-post this message across several BEP threads) Hi there, just a quick notification that we have just merged https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/pull/918 and it may be interesting to look at the...
> Better but it seems that dumping extra metadata in the json did not trigger any failure in the bids examples repo, so let's open an issue to remember to...
crosslinking, this PR needs a spec PR and a following validator PR to be merged first: - spec: https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/pull/1106 - validator: https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-validator/pull/1496/
The PRs mentioned in https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-examples/pull/324#issuecomment-1192212450 have meanwhile been merged, so I think you can address some of the reviewer comments above @tpatpa
I like the idea, because it would disambiguate the `Authors` field that [we currently have](https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/03-modality-agnostic-files.html#dataset_descriptionjson). > List of individuals who contributed to the creation/curation of the dataset. Then `Authors` could...
as far as I know, @effigies prepared the synthetic dataset --> I think your request is reasonable, but perhaps the scope ("tracking the full development of the spec") is a...
> Would that seem like an acceptable way to proceed? for me yes, and thanks a lot for all your activity in the last weeks to steadily improve BIDS! (edit:...
> I think at this point the procedure would be sending a draft PR with the suggested changes for a more focused discussion, is that correct @franklin-feingold @sappelhoff ? Yes,...
According to https://bids.neuroimaging.io/get_involved.html @oesteban leads this effort.