Stefan Appelhoff
Stefan Appelhoff
I think we can remove redundancy on a case-by-case basis, one PR at a time. If we concisely explain principles and use cross-links, then this should not impede the reading...
Thanks, you seem to have made this PR from your old fork ... are you sure that this will not reintroduce some bad history? Why not delete your old fork,...
I see ... I also just realized that we won't introduce bad history via PRs, but rather via direct pushes to `master`. Is this ready to be merged? If you...
> Are you aware of any sensitive information in those logs so we might better not share them publicly? to my knowledge the CircleCI logs are openly accessible anyhow ......
Thanks a lot for describing the problem so clearly! > While there are multiple candidate solutions to BIDS Derivatives definitions to circumvent this limitation What about 4\. Not using inheritance...
> create an appendix page dedicated to the inheritance principle I like your suggestion and I think it addresses the concern of "over-complicating" > > It would be good to...
> BIDS 1.x has inheritance principle and thus IMHO it must stay and only get improved within 1.x series of BIDS. just a note: option 4 above was **not** about...
crosslinking to: - https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/issues/1130
@robertoostenveld I would prefer if you could add that in a separate PR to the `bep030_nirs` branch. But having another example would be great!
Thanks @rob-luke