Stefan Appelhoff
Stefan Appelhoff
Note that a quick search of our history yields that **I** was the one who introduced `_digitizer.txt` into both spec and validator in: - https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-validator/pull/789 - https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/pull/248 My intention was...
cc @robertoostenveld your opinion would be valuable here
> or we could have the citation.file be the place where we store that info and use a macro to update the src/introduction.md I would be in favor of this...
Both seem to have their benefits and drawbacks. - CITATION.cff - `+` it's part of the standardized file and may even populate zenodo metadata for the PDF spec release -...
taking off the 1.9 milestone, as this is mostly visuals that can potentially be added **after** a release.
Thanks @hoechenberger and @nicholst I updated the post with your sensible suggestions
> I fully agree that having a separate gender key could be beneficial in certain situations. Currently we are limiting this discussion to `sex` and `age`, which have an undocumented...
Thanks @rwblair that's really helpful. Can you get the same info also for those datasets on OpenNeuro? ~And would it be possible to share the script you may have used...
cc @VisLab for the potential HED ontology/vocabulary of body parts
is this issue perhaps also a duplicate of: - #1275 @jomasator2?