Stefan Appelhoff

Do we still need this? Where are we missing a 3D figure in our docs? This was the example worked on in #980: https://mne.tools/mne-bids/stable/auto_examples/convert_ieeg_to_bids.html#sphx-glr-auto-examples-convert-ieeg-to-bids-py looks fine to me? I'd close...

+1 to improve the docs based on the 4 points in the OP once that is clarified, I think it's easier to live with the fact that `add_channels` actually concatenates...

I wrote a tiny suggestion about this in #9509 which I now closed as a duplicate of this present issue. Let me copy paste for convenience: #### Describe the new...

> I think we should make a tutorial on ERP-style analyses that contain 90% of the analyses people would be interested in. Even if it's long, a .. contents:: at...

or you could find a documentation of micromed's `.trc` file format and post it here, maybe someone in the future will implement this.

> you have worked on meas_date stuff with anonymization and BIDS I think, okay to: yes, I think this three step procedure makes sense 👍 in BIDS, timestamps may either...

> Wouldn't that mean that the current MNE-BIDS implementation violates the standard? I don't see how. MNE-BIDS writes UTC time with Z indicator (= zero offset). Any information about offsets...

I only see this now, but let me add some explanation (no solution, only information): @robertoostenveld's [computations](https://robertoostenveld.nl/electrode/) versus my [own computations](https://github.com/sappelhoff/eeg_positions#details) are slightly different in their assumptions. - Robert says...

 :point_up: for the record, the additions for motion should all be done like so: 1. checking out the `bep029_motion` branch (in **this** repo, see: https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-examples/tree/bep029_motion) 2. checking out a...

I like `index_columns`, I think that'd be more clear to a larger group of people, and I also like explicitly declaring index columns.