Sander Van Balen
Sander Van Balen
> I think it might actually be a duplicate of #6519 Actually, this one may be a bit broader than the other one. Same root cause but slightly different symptoms.
Hi, thanks for looking into this. However, if I recall correctly this is a breaking change without an upgrade path for the old behavior. I believe #6630 should have been...
@kbukum1 just to make sure I understood correctly, can you confirm that no changes to the default versioning strategy (e.g. #10060) will be released before the fix for #6630? How...
I reviewed it to the best of my ability. I have to confess I'm still unclear as to your plan with regards to #6630. The reason I ask is that...
I also feel like this should be a development package. Perhaps it can be exposed as an optional extra `arrow[dev]` or `arrow[types]`? This way you can still make abstraction of...
I managed to reproduce an instance of this issue reliably in a manner that I believe is relevant in practice. Turns out `pytest` creates some `pyc` files for its plugins,...
@pfmoore do I understand correctly that you're of the opinion that this is an issue with the packages that write to their package directory? So it would be appropriate to...
Thanks a lot for the feedback. I'll escalate the pytest case to their issue tracker then.
Oh wow, I completely lost track of that... My apologies, I will do it today (and link it here). Thanks for the reminder.
I found an issue on the pytest issue tracker that was created a few days before this one: pytest-dev/pytest#10781. It hasn't received a lot of attention so far, perhaps because...