Sancarn
Sancarn
@tyaga001 I think you didn't read the whole PR as this was discussed in https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome/pull/3153#issuecomment-2292433415 and subsequently in https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome/pull/3153#issuecomment-2306646682
Thanks @sindresorhus 🥳
@CodeByStella your personal readme looks stella! 😁
## Awesome-lint run Fixed various issues. Many issues still remain but are invalid. Examples: * `Table of Contents must be the first section` - The symbology is very important in...
> So, the only thing missing is the 2nd PR review, is that correct? Yes, I think so 🙂
Also iirc I think I held off applying because of the symbology. I think the symbology is theoretically not allowed...
Not sure why this was closed down... I need to do this
> It would be allowed at the end in the Footnotes section. Considering that the icons have a tooltip when hovering on them, I personally would mind putting the symbology...
> > Not sure why this was closed down > > I discovered recently that if you write "Fixes" or "Closes" in front an issue inside the description of a...
Closeout in progress https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome/pull/3153