Sam Kellett

I'd definitely prefer the UDL over the macro. The macro feels like a significant step backwards considering how cutting edge this library is. Seeing as the macro actually has similar...

> Would you suggest the dyno::literals namespace be dropped in that case? no because if the UDL is defined inside only the `dyno` namespace the user is required to do...

* Ternary operator (it's actually shocking how bad the had version is): https://godbolt.org/g/6bALYs * Self calling lamdba (again, bad is really bad): https://godbolt.org/g/rGhTSX * Initializer lists: https://godbolt.org/g/cvfZxs etc..

can this be a generic fall-through for the hana::to function? like if not specialised (ala mpl::vector/mpl::list) then just pull out all the types. so: ``` static_assert(hana::to(meta::list{}) == hana::tuple_t); static_assert(hana::to(eggs::variant{1}) ==...