Sam Cunliffe

Should the options docs just go in the body of README.md? Perhaps in a `` (I do love me a details). ``` Click to see more information about the questions......

I remember discussing this and we decided that one author was the least of all evils. The problem with multiple authors, is that there's not nice syntax to do this....

I think it might be even worse: because we provide issue templates in the template's `.github` directory (and possibly other things), the `github_user` **must** be a username even though the...

This is not fixed via #308 although that PR solves my [comment, above](https://github.com/UCL-ARC/python-tooling/issues/305#issuecomment-1947897708).

[Already done?](https://github-pages.arc.ucl.ac.uk/python-tooling/pages/utilities.html#command-line-interface)

It probably means that the title of the page is not great. If we're going to add a list of library recommendations: perhaps it should just be "Libraries"?

I _think_ I vote to rename "Utility Libraries" → "Libraries" or "Libraries we recommend" but! keep a long list of them all there (alphabetised: API libraries, CLI libraries, GUI...). Since...

Yeah sorry, this is me writing minutes for something that was said in real life and not getting the name right. It should go in, sure. It sounds like it's...

Half-vote for keeping 3.9 🗳️. (I guess that's option 1.5 🙃 )

~~Wait, 3.8 is EOL, no?~~ Nope. 3.8's EOL is 2024-10 so option 1 will become what I voted for very soon.