Roy Jacobs

Okay, I'll try to add some tests that demonstrate this issue and do an appropriate fix. Thanks for the feedback!

Yes, you're right. The problem of having a large API surface is that stuff that I don't personally use (i.e. `mappedRemove`) can be a bit untested. I'll need to take...

I don't think this behavior can be changed without breaking backwards compatibility. In your case for instance, there is no way for the plugin to figure out if you wanted...

The escape characters are certainly a fair suggestion. I wouldn't suggest that people using that syntax are crazy per se, though. :) Would you like to take a stab at...

:) Okay, good! If you have any questions, just add them to this issue. It might be a good idea to just take your fiddle-code and use that as a...

Okay, that certainly seems like something you'd want to have filled out!

@cspotcode have you made any progress on filling out that form? :)

@cspotcode No worries, just checking if you were still with us :)

@Tavriets, would it be possible for you to create a pull request with your fix, and add some unit tests that show the behavior? (i.e. the test should fail before...

I would prefer the syntax to match the object structure as closely as possible. So if you have an object that looks like `a: { b: { c: "d" }...