Roman Useinov

sounds good, feature names would need some work indeed. Naming is always hard!

@alt-ivan how do I reproduce this? I’d love to see the steps both for Lotus and Forest to find the culprit. Thank you in advance!

@alt-ivan Thanks for lining that up for me, it's helpful. The requests and responses would be nice to see as well if possible. With the sequence above - how can...

> 3a1291d4655fb641a85d25dd288cd3f19d5c2c2d This does not seem to exist anymore, could you try the latest `main`? Though as long as it had my latest `SyncSubmitBlock` change - it should not matter....

> Seems like I didn't save them after all 🤦 ... I'll redo the sequence and send the requests/responses. Sorry for the delay. > > > Please do!

> I figured as much when looking at the codebase. I only stepped through the `SyncSubmitBlock` impl and there I saw that the created tipset doesn't get a CID assigned...

> > I figured as much when looking at the codebase. I only stepped through the `SyncSubmitBlock` impl and there I saw that the created tipset doesn't get a CID...

@alt-ivan Thanks a lot for looking into this, no it starts to make a lot of sense! > When I don't connect Forest/Lotus and execute `SyncSubmitBlock` on Forest, then that...

@alt-ivan Can you please try going through the process using this commit: https://github.com/ChainSafe/forest/pull/4328 ? It's going to be merged to master automatically in a little bit. This should fix the...

> Good news! I tried it on the latest commit and mining works! Nice! > 1. It seems that Lotus processes the block received via `SyncSubmitBlock` synchronously while Forest does...