Rubén Zorrilla

About having the app, I think we could pack it in the GiD binaries. Is is not a large application and comes with some features that could be useful for...

> +1 for adding chimera_parts in the solver settings. I will make the necessary changes in the implementation to use that. > secondly a question : > I do like...

> Why I am interested in doing this is the flexibility of having the possibility of meshing background and patches differently. Actually to have capability is what @jginternational and me...

> > Actually to have capability is what @jginternational and me discussed yesterday. We just wanted your confirmation to carry on the developments. > > I definitely love to have...

After speaking with @adityaghantasala, the TODOs for the json are: - [ ] Remove the `implementation` flag in `solver_settings`. - [ ] We agree on having two (or eventually n)...

Regarding the GUI, it looks OK. The unique thing missing is to make it possible that the user selects the `model_part_inside_boundary_name`. This is the interior boundary of the patch. The...

> Regarding the GUI, it looks OK. The unique thing missing is to make it possible that the user selects the `model_part_inside_boundary_name`. This is the interior boundary of the patch....

We should decide if the reference monolithic element is now the `QSVMS` (this goes in) or if we keep the `VMS` one (this is closed). If we decide that the...

Guys, this PR deals with the addition of the non-newtonian constitutive laws and the setting of the `QSVMS` as reference element in the `FluidDynamicsApplication`. I can see some changes related...

:confused: