Rubén Zorrilla

> yes we can ... ! I'll try to create it.

> @rubenzorrilla ... How can I help here to continue with finishing the problem type. From the last commits, there is minor change in the JSON format. I will attach...

Hi @adityaghantasala ! I guess you need this functionality to define the patches for your Chimera stuff. After briefly discussing about it with @jginternational , we feel that to fix...

@KratosMultiphysics/dem @roigcarlo is this solved?

> Agreed with @ddiezrod, but I'm adding the API breaker tag Well, I'm not sure we're breaking the API but changing the default behavior. Let me add the behavior change...

@marcnunezc @inigolcanalejo I think that the test crashing in here is yours. The point is that the primal solution solver in the optimizing is assuming the input model part to...

Fine for me too. Thanks @jcotela.

Great. As it involves changing a few crucial classes I'll add it for the next @KratosMultiphysics/technical-committee discussion. Nevertheless, at first glance everything makes sense for me.

Note for myself: after (re-)discussing this in the @KratosMultiphysics/technical-committee we decided to basically mimic what is in the `GetSpecifications` of the element but making it `static`.

> > Note for myself: after (re-)discussing this in the @KratosMultiphysics/technical-committee we decided to basically mimic what is in the `GetSpecifications` of the element but making it `static`. > >...