Romain

Hi @eos175 @supergoudvis116, Thanks for your work on this! We would definitely like Traefik to provide three healthcheck mechanisms for TCP services. The situation is a bit tedious. @ddtmachado has...

Hi @eos175, Sorry for the late reply and for the misunderstanding! > My Proposal: Instead of a two-PR approach, I suggest we implement the unified architecture directly within the existing...

Hi @eos175, Sorry for the late reply and for the misunderstanding! > My Proposal: Instead of a two-PR approach, I suggest we implement the unified architecture directly within the existing...

Hi @SimonMTS, Thanks for your feedback. > @eos175 and @supergoudvis116 are saying that the architecture in https://github.com/traefik/traefik/pull/11238 is not going to work, and will have to be replaced by the...

Hi @SimonMTS, Thanks for your feedback. > @eos175 and @supergoudvis116 are saying that the architecture in https://github.com/traefik/traefik/pull/11238 is not going to work, and will have to be replaced by the...

Hello @michal-kralik, Thanks a lot for this contribution! I have pushed some commits from review, to add docs, and also rebase the changes to be up to date with the...

Hi @N0tExisting, Thanks for this contribution! We are wondering whether it should be put out of draft and be reviewed. Are you still iterating on it?

Hi @N0tExisting, We are closing this pull request due to lack of activity. Feel free to reopen it at any time!

@xhejtman Are you experiencing the same 418 status code as @k0da ? @k0da It seems that what you are reporting is tracked in #12332

Hello @sliva-name, Thank you for reporting this issue, and we apologise for the inconvenience. Does my [comment](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/pull/12360#issuecomment-3626250303) on #12360 answer this issue?