Romain

Hello @ifross89, We were just wondering if you think you might want to iterate on this at some point?

Hello @ifross89, Thanks for your feedback and congrats ;-) During today's triage session, the maintainers agreed to put it on the roadmap, so we'll rework the PR whenever we have...

@andsarr @peterkappelt @yongzhang We have reworked the PR and added adaptive behavior for the `X-Forwarded-For` header on the reverse proxy side. With the changes, the IP that matches the `trustedIPs`...

Hello @NoOverflow, Thanks for sharing this! Are you still iterating on the implementation? Are you planning to open a PR? Please feel free to open a pull request to draw...

@NoOverflow Sorry for the late answer! > Hey @rtribotte, what's the PR flow for Traefik ? Should I open the PR right now as draft to kickstart a discussion ?...

Hello @JHK, Thanks for the feedback and sorry for the late answer. > In summary, yes, the proposal is to provide an option to deactivate internal spans for more targeted...

Hello @ttys3, Thanks for this contribution! As this would be an enhancement, the changes should target the master branch for the next v3 minor version. Could you please rebase it?...

Hello @ttys3, I was implying that the current option is static, meaning the configuration won't change at runtime and that this could be a limitation because one could not often...

Hello @ttys3, No, it shouldn't be an access-log middleware, my suggestion is to be able to opt-out inside the service configuration, with something like: ```yaml services: service1: accesslogs: false ```...

Hello @ttys3, Actually, the file provider is no different from any other and produces a dynamic configuration that can be updated at runtime. In fact, in order to provide a...