Rustam

@TheForgetTime hello, can you tell what actions preceded this?

This is a good idea, otherwise windows are created for each xaml and it is not clear which one it belongs to. 

@wdcossey does it look awesome when planning to do PR? :)

@ForNeVeR, hello! Do you update the [17-avalonia](https://github.com/ForNeVeR/wpf-math/tree/feature/17-avalonia) branch yourself? Or can I make edits to this thread without updates? P.S. I have no goals yet. I'm just eyeing :)

Can we replace bg / fg `Brush` with `RgbaColor` (maybe also new struct with _color_ and _opacity_) and only create a `Brush` when rendering? https://github.com/ForNeVeR/wpf-math/search?p=1&q=brush&unscoped_q=brush

It seems that we only need to know the color information: - [Using colours in LaTeX](https://www.overleaf.com/learn/latex/Using_colours_in_LaTeX) - [Brushes and text](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/style/brushes#brushes-and-text)

Hello! > * make `FormulaBlock` public Need to do just that? Or is it supposed to further improve the API? I ask, because, as I understand it, we need to...

I am new to using avalonia / wpf > How can I help? I think you can close this issue :) Next, I will share previously unspecified actions when updating...

> I've heard of something called `AvaloniaResource`, should we _maybe_ change the way our resources are defined? We can do [this](https://github.com/rstm-sf/wpf-math/commit/52f75d04cbcbc084b58d28c8d6daa86266f9639e#diff-8e2ad76ae480be5e27d0c97f4ca89befR29) , thereby obtaining a slightly simplified [code](https://github.com/rstm-sf/wpf-math/commit/52f75d04cbcbc084b58d28c8d6daa86266f9639e#diff-c0ccb8811c1bd5394f064a7e82a2733aR225).

> > > @rstm-sf, will it fix the 0.9 migration issue? No