robert

As an example of how this might be useful: Let's say a specific parachain is set up so producing, gossiping, and importing a block takes 4s but the relay-chain block...

Can you confirm that the firewall allows outgoing connections to be initiated by the process?

Yes. Worth noting that in #6014 we leaned heavier on the "Also, never cross session boundaries" part.

Yeah, I'm still against this change. I think it's a bad idea. Quoting from before > > IMO it was a huge mistake to ever have introduced these two different...

I agree, it should be consistent in the consensus implementations. I think it makes most sense to stick to the terminology of the paper and document that we use "Substrate...

For example, we use the notion "voter_set" and "set_id" in GRANDPA, which is closer to the paper. Should we also rename this to session? Even those this also refers to...

This should rather be an addendum to the section about whisper ("this could be considered as 'Whisper 2.0'"). Locking it into the title is a bit too far IMO.

We shouldn't put the entire `SessionInfo` into the signed data type because it's relatively heavy and we need to pass around thousands of signed messages. The `AssertSessionValidator` datatype seems like...

I've been reflecting on how this would be implemented in practice with a few questions: 1. Which subsystem should be responsible for informing the prospective parachains subsystem of new things...

Here's an alternative version which doesn't care about equivocations (which are damn complicated to report to the chain anyway until we have sequence numbers in candidate receipts) but still handles...