Vinay M

@akritimishra21 This is probably an awx or galaxy issue, please write an issue over at [awx](https://github.com/ansible/awx)

@tin-ot 1. This is how the update password attribute should be used according to the documentation. 2. Could you provide me a playbook that could reproduce the case where the...

Hey @tnizharadze, really amazing work. I'll be reviewing this and doing minor changes so we can make the CI happy and get it merged. I'll let you know if any...

Closing as above changes has already been added from a different PR

@yheffen Can you add a playbook as an example for the above

@JuanBH255 The above issue is fixed in PR #1073, let me know if this fixes it at your end.

> @roverflow has fixed been publish for me to test yet? > According to the below, the latest collection version is 8.0.0 which was last updated a month ago. >...

@JuanBH255 The play will not be idempotent as there are `secrets` or `passwords` involved in the playbook with snmp-user. It effects idempotency of module as configuration applied is not reflected...

@JuanBH255 Yes, Unfortunately the above behavior of it being idempotent is actually a bug and was fixed in this pr [here](https://github.com/ansible-collections/cisco.ios/pull/1014/files). Hence it is not idempotent

@JuanBH255 i will be closing off the issue as the above issue is resolved, please feel free to open another issue if you face any. Thanks!