Andreas Rossberg
Andreas Rossberg
Closing this, since it seems to have been superseded by other PRs.
I am not sure. Technically, we haven't reached the W3's living standard status yet, only after we're through with the current process (hopefully very soon). And CI currently pushes every...
I would actually suggest we rather merge this into the 3.0 branch.
@tlively: > I do think it would be good to avoid updating upstream spec tests to accommodate phase 1 proposals, but maybe it would be ok for phase 2 proposals....
> If a test is in the main test directory then it will not enable the multi-memory flag (until the multi-memory proposal merges into the main spec). Are you saying...
Semantically, it doesn't matter for the module itself. This is in fact the case for the internal order of any section in the binary format — except for globals, where...
Users of the C API can still look up by name using the export types of the module. Just iterate both lists together, they don't _have to_ assume a particular...
Legacy EH should definitely not be considered phase 4, since it never reached that state. And there is no obligation for engines to implement it — in fact, they are...
You should be able to simply use a C/C++ NULL as the C-side representation of a null reference.
On 11 January 2017 at 14:56, Ryan Lamansky wrote: > Although not required by the spec, an advanced WASM-to-native compiler > could consolidate duplicate Type entries (if any), and store...