rcl_interfaces
rcl_interfaces copied to clipboard
Naming of fields for Time message is inconsistent with rclcpp::Time
I'm working with both builtin_interfaces/msg/Time
and rclcpp::Time
, and I found that the naming of the fields is inconsistent between them:
- For
rclcpp::Time
fields are calledseconds
andnanoseconds
- But for
builtin_interfaces::msg::Time
fields are calledsec
andnanosec
.
Would it be possible for both time representations to use the same field names? If possible I would suggest following the convention from rclcpp::Time
, which uses full yet succint names.
Thank you in advance! :pray:
Yoshua