Roman Ivanov
Roman Ivanov
It is just lack of testing, sorry, indentation is not trigerred on "invoke(".
please share link to sources here, we will launch over code base ourself to minimize close-reopen states.
> Here, we should not give violation for `` because it is an inline HTML tag. We should give violation only if the HTML tag is a block-level tag and...
@rdiachenko , please review issue and place approval label if you agree.
>li is a block element, I think we should give a violation here because of preceding p This looks like general html Google practice, lets not do this for this...
@Zopsss , as you start this issue, please create quick update on Inputs to declare most of cases that come to mind and declaring by violations comments place where violation...
This property introduced at https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/1332 Examples of Checks in website are weird and unlikely to be valid. But it is unrelated problem. We should not change this property, it should...
@Zopsss , please send first PR with update for Inputs to define most use cases and behavior on them. commit message `supplemental: tests for #15503` lines with future violations should...
this is new bug, please open issue on it. I think it will be better to fix this new defect first, it should be easy fix, and it will simply...
I think we addressed it at https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/pull/15405#discussion_r1697058346 If not, need t complete, please restate it, we might not understand something.