Roman Ivanov
Roman Ivanov
Please put in xx required information. Please strictly follow issue template to provide all details we need
@rnveach , @pbludov , @strkkk , please share your thought on this issue.
@pbludov , I tried to read your post several times and I do not understand it. Please update it to be more precise. My question was: Ctor in nested classes...
>meant to be service-loadable Please share what exact you mean by this. The more details the better, it is not only for me but for any other person who questioning...
we did some fixed to remove `package` visibility in our code in scope of - https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/12241. But this issue is still valid and Check should be updated.
>Should InnerTypeLast check reports inner enums which are not placed at the bottom of the primary class? Yes, it should.
all changes are merged, if something else required, open new issue,
>Checks have all private fields. I pretty sure it is covered by our modifier Check. >. No check subpackage should depend on each other. It is covered by jarch cycle...
https://checkstyle.org/config_design.html#VisibilityModifier >was to represent checks don't rely on other checks. I think we need to practice existing cycles tests to find how to make more advanced validation.
>I think we should revert this back to no tokens are required. All tokens should be acceptable and default. Yes. To let user create one instance for class fields and...