Roman Ivanov
Roman Ivanov
@stoyanK7 , please proceed with lineRrange. let me know if something blocks you to proceed. Do not pay attention on Checker for now that is not from your new module,...
If you fighting with Checker, it it might be ok to extend suppression , it is experimental validation. You can always show what you have and we continue to find...
> We have discovered that BeforeAll used in conjunction with production static field modifications has allowed some surviving mutations that are false positives I confused, I see no updates in...
Lets not forbid annotation, we will try to recheck this during code review.
This is big project, and it is almost blocked by incomplete xpath support in Checks. As all Checks become xpath compliant, auto correction become good point to discuss. It is...
No special API is required to make automated correction, that is why it is already exists in some plugins. It might be not very convenient, and this is what we...
there are some autofixes implementation for Checks violations at http://unkrig.de/w/Cs-contrib.unkrig.de , project owned by @aunkrig .
Investigate one more tool with autofix https://twitter.com/jon_k_schneider/status/1230500526250496001?s=19
@rnveach , there are few pitest failures. I placing breaking compatibility label because we remove method from API class - `Violation.clearCache()`.
>PR is currently the first pass of changes and I am going to add more changes. please share details.