Roman Grothausmann

> What happens if you manually load the initial parameter maps into your python session, prepends them to your parameter map vector, and then run the registration? I think I...

> What happens if you manually load the initial parameter maps into your python session, prepends them to your parameter map vector, and then run the registration? That works. I...

Still having this issues with current SimpleElastix (https://github.com/SuperElastix/SimpleElastix/commit/8244e0001f4137514b0f545f1e846910b3dd7769): https://github.com/romangrothausmann/elastix_scripts/commit/b639883a0d44ec0970a3978421821b73ad91b901 While the above workaround (https://github.com/SuperElastix/SimpleElastix/issues/121#issuecomment-567476205) works fine in simple cases, it would be very helpful if SimpleElastix could do this internally,...

I managed to get 64bit "Join Source Image" (Jsrc) working, now even with _itkScalarToRGBPixelFunctor_. 64bit is essential for proper function of **gWS**, as otherwise casting to 16bit causes multiple regions...

Apart from some minor tweaks, I added a new layer to **gWS** that allows the user to see and inspect the output of the pre-filters that yield the input to...

Got closed due to branch renaming.

Parallelized itkJoinCopyFilter now working in **CnJ** mode, which about halves the time needed for processing each **CnJ**-click. The other half is apparently spent on a single-threaded process (which could possibly...

The single-threaded process that took up time was StoreUndoPoint, which is not working for CnJ in v3.4 any way. On a workstation with 24 Intel Xeon CPUs (from 2012) processing...

Where could I set the precision used for the gradient calculation or is it hard-coded somewhere to float or double?

While testing that #62 works as expected, even setting DerivativeThreshold of 1e9 did not solve the issue reported here, that under some (unknown) circumstances no gradient decent optimizer starts to...