Raif Olson

Yes. I need to do some more testing before it gets merged though.

This most recent commit fixes this issue: (https://github.com/roboflow/supervision/pull/1049#issuecomment-2026165713) If all of the detections in a frame have low confidence, then the tracker will still return these detections, but with an...

Yes. On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 8:34 AM Piotr Skalski ***@***.***> wrote: > Hi @rolson24 👋🏻 is this ready for testing > and review? > > — > Reply...

After further testing, the whole idea of using track_ids to signify whether a track is valid or not will not work. This is because joint_stracks and sub_stracks rely on track_ids...

I wrote the code based on Roboflow's implementation of ByteTrack for the core, basetrack, and matching modules. (basetrack and matching are unchanged) and I used the official implementation of [BoT-SORT](https://github.com/NirAharon/BoT-SORT)...

Hi @SkalskiP! Can I work on this issue? I think I can implement this in the way you want without modifying update_with_tensors and in a pretty simple way.

Sorry about the number of commits. I tried to squash some together but messed up a bit. I can delete and resubmit if you need me to.

Great! I made those changes and can submit a new PR. Before I do though, I am wondering if we should add a method to the STrack class to get...

See this comment (https://github.com/roboflow/supervision/pull/1034#issuecomment-2016634735) about a question on possible change to the implementation.

Hi @SkalskiP I made a silly mistake in this PR with using enumerate to get the index of each track, because I forgot to test the new version. I have...