rolfTurner

On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 07:37:15 +0000 Maëlle Salmon wrote: > No email even in the spam folder, right? Well, not as such. :-) But that was essentially the problem....

I sourced my dem01 script and the graph of the derivative of dbinom() now looks correct. I also executed > library(Deriv) > packageVersion("Deriv") [1] ‘4.1.4’ > D2 D2(3,8,0.6) and got...

Ah!!! The light dawns. I really *was* being silly though --- it's now clear in retrospect. (Hindsight is 20-20, and all that.). I put together the code for my rule...

Here is another annoyance/item to add to your already overfull to-do list. I have found that when the "x" argument, provided to the derivative of dbinom() ,is a vector, disconcerting...

The "new.env()" problem seems to be solved: tempEnv

Arrghhh! I see the problem. Thanks for working out what was going wrong. In the application that I have in mind, I really need x to be allowed to be...