rofl0r

this sounds like the commit message of a pull request. but i can't see any patches attached here... did you see the comment about "project scope" in the README ?

i agree that it'd be nice to have but it's work... as a quicky, you could try to just `cat *.diff > cumulative.patch` in the musl-cross-make repo in the patches/gcc-6.3.0...

thanks for notifying us of this issue. does this commit https://github.com/GregorR/musl-cross/commit/19529754abde58608d9b91ca2f80c6cdc058501d fix it for you ? (it is in branch binutils_chdr, not yet master in case that matters.) > I...

i'm adding @tlaurion to the CC list, as he seems to be working on this.

> Project is staling though. are you refering to musl-cross-make or another project? in case of mcm, i'm aware from IRC conversations that @richfelker is working on it and has...

you should use `x86_64-linux-musl-ar` libtlo_plugin.so is only available in a full dynamic linked toolchain.

as of today, this is now implemented in GCC 4.4.7, 4.5.4, 4.6.4, 4.7.4. 4.0.3, 4.2.1, 4.8.x, 4.9.x, 5.3.0 still require backporting the relevant bits from musl-cross-make.

a first step into the direction seems to be to build binutils (and maybe gcc?) with `--enable-initfini-array`

how is this related to this project ?

> I can't promise I won't mess it up beyond usability for other purposes, however. if you start with adopting the patch before changing the defaults to meet your taste...