Raman Gupta

> Would this match pull request #2201 ? I could try to refresh/rebase the pull request. @pdvrieze Yes, I believe it would.

> will need 2 kt definition to describe `HomePhone` in `Data` and `Data2`. Why would it? In that case `IPhone` can go back to being an interface... it doesn't change...

> The kotlinx.serialization library (and formats) is fundamentally a Kotlin model first serialization approach (the serialization follows the Kotlin model). Given that it is a multi-format serialization approach this is...

> > cannot have a different proto number for Data and Data2 > > That is the point. Ok, a potential solution is to use type annotations: ```kotlin // example...

> Actually this is not how the ProtoBuf format serializes. Data is serialized as: Are you sure? When I use this input: ```kotlin @Serializable data class Data( @ProtoNumber(1) val name:...

My gold standard for this would likely be the Log4j2 [RollingFileAppender](https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/2.x/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/RollingFileAppender.java) but that is far more "full-featured" than I would expect from Kermit. I've implemented something custom locally which takes...

@kpgalligan Created PR https://github.com/touchlab/Kermit/pull/406.

Looking for this capability as well. I'm building a system ([a simplified no-annotation Spring Boot](https://github.com/rocketraman/bootable)) in which configurations are modular, and the possible prefixes are not known by the configuration...

> // above exists today, sort of: ideally we could get a "Configuration" or "Environment" object back that can then be used as below (in addition to existing uses) >...

This feature is in 2.8.0 and above, and documentation is added in PR #490.