Ross Angle

Heya @shawwn, I hope my comments on this haven't dissuaded you from merging. Most of 'em can be fixed later. I just wanted to express some factors like the Racket...

@kennethrapp Thanks for the attention to this issue! There's a build error at the moment.... I guess like the import of `syntax/stx` was necessary in order to get the function...

Here's a link to the Arc Forum thread since some discussion has happened there: http://arclanguage.org/item?id=21162

Hmm, I'm not confident with that approach -- I think `setforms` oughta be in control of performing ssexpansion -- but my first stab at it would have issues of its...

Oh, I just realized another thing about this that isn't quite right: The design of `setforms` makes it so in operations like `(or= ((...) (...)) 42)`, the `(...)` expressions only...

Hmm, I'm sorry I seem to be rattling off a lot of different comments in a disorganized way today, but another thing comes to mind: Your implementation uses `(or (if...

> > > > This change causes `or=` to evaluate those expressions more than once. > > Interesting. Could you give an example? I haven't tested this yet, but try...

Awesome. :)

As I was saying in the thread, I think a good way to go about this is to have Anarki's `read` do a recursive pass over the Racket `read` result...

Seems to me if the list of users who voted on something is already stored, the information about whether their vote was considered a sockpuppet vote could be stored alongside...