Robert

> What would it take to add cross-compilation support to this as per https://nix.dev/tutorials/cross-compilation? I'm not sure I understand what you're going for here, could you elaborate? (The issue https://github.com/PostgREST/postgrest/issues/2478...

> Out of curiosity I pgbenched pipeline mode on [fa50be2](https://github.com/PostgREST/postgrest/commit/fa50be2f1a064bba7039d01de913d79f30154c49). Thanks for this, particularly explicitly showing how to get those numbers! I'll wrap up some related experiments with postgrest itself...

Ok, here are some bounds on what pipeline mode could conceivably get us. With #2682, I ran `postgrest-loadtest` while varying: PostgREST: - vanilla, with `setPgLocals` query before the regular request...

> > PostgREST: > > vanilla, with setPgLocals query before the regular request query > > removing setPgLocals entirely > > replacing setPgLocals by a plain SELECT 1 > >...

Sorry, have been offline for a bit and missed this. Catching up these days Regarding the concrete question about `reset` ([`PQreset`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/libpq-connect.html#LIBPQ-PQRESET) in libpq): I don't think that's going to be...

@adamwespiser could you have a look at this?

> 9.2.6 support is blocked on an ostensibly unnecessary `< 0.11.4` constraint on bytestring. It builds fine here with ghc-9.2.6 (against bytestring-0.11.3.1), could you elaborate as to how it's blocked?...

The tight upper bound on bytestring does look accidental -- I've update https://github.com/protolude/protolude/pull/141 to relax that.

Yeah, I tried digging into this before but failed to find a fix (or I thought I had a fix?). Thanks for filing the issue!

> Meandering Numbers: Allow for drawing lines from one cell to another as auxiliary marks. Good idea. > Also allow for inputting small numbers in the corners (like in Rooms...