Rob Scott
Rob Scott
Thanks @pleshakov! This is going to require some careful review from multiple people. /cc @arkodg @mlavacca @sunjayBhatia /ok-to-test /hold
I've been meaning to take a look at this too, sorry I lost track of it! Will aim to get some feedback in this week. /assign
@arkodg that makes sense to me, @pleshakov can you rebase this PR? RC2 is scheduled to go out tomorrow, if this PR is ready before that, I'll merge it.
Covered by #3047, closing this one out.
Thanks to everyone (@aojea, @danwinship, @thockin) for the feedback on this both on the PR and in our review meeting. We've released RC1 and RC2 and are planning to move...
Formally closing this one out, thanks for the feedback on this! We'll be releasing v1.1 in another ~3 hours.
Thanks @akhilles! /lgtm /assign @thockin
Thanks @LiorLieberman! /lgtm /assign @johnbelamaric
>The actual topology rules would only be specified on the (endpoint) pods; the scheduler would use those rules (as it does now) to spread out the pods, and kube-proxy would...