roadracer96

That is what I am doing in the interim. The problem is, you cant appropriately name template interfaces on the sub-slots. I thought that it may be a beneficial feature/add...

Isn't unlimited nesting already allowed in other places? Like regions? I'd argue for that to future proof it if possible. It only takes one vendor doing something differently to make...

Sorry about the delay.. Lots of demands on my time right now. Right now, we allow a single variable in defining interface names in the form of { module }....

FYI, I just ran into this issue. It happens on ANY MX device on ANY version. This boils down to MXs having a different configuration schema than non-MX devices. MXs...

After over a year, when can we expect some movement on this one? It is a pretty substantial issue, IMHO.

Ita ALL MXs. Not just the 204. Every MX that has ever existed is subject to this issue. On Fri, Dec 23, 2022, 9:15 AM Epiq Sty ***@***.***> wrote: >...

Im just going to point out that the Juniper MX is the flagship Juniper device and this short-coming is an enormous setback in functionality on these devices.

2 years now.... @rohitthakur2590 If you need an MX to test against, I can make one available.

I should be able to make something available in our lab. Give me a week or two to get approval and get something setup. On Wed, May 8, 2024, 2:09 ...

Possibly related to this? https://github.com/ncclient/ncclient/issues/185