rnveach

Identified at https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/pull/15117#discussion_r1654849384 , we should also document that we will only support the latest keywords and users can apply an override to the property to revert to older Java...

@romani Please open this issue you talk about removing this check and having something else in it place.

@romani I agree. My thoughts are I am ok with only handling the most obvious, no denying cases if they can be achieved without issue. If they become too complex,...

> BUT it does not work on real life cases: @romani If you are referring to this case that we don't support some `return`s, then this issue doesn't look related...

Like last time, I am fine supporting the most clear cut cases. See https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/3885#issuecomment-283345102 . My stand hasn't changed any.

Anyone is welcome to work on a fix. There are no current plans to work on indentation issues.

Closing this. Please create a new PR with other admins as the reviewers. https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/15643#issuecomment-2336777333

Blocking comment https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/15089#issuecomment-2183780225

Closing this. Please create a new PR with other admins as the reviewers. https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/15643#issuecomment-2336777333

https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/blob/master/src/main/java/com/puppycrawl/tools/checkstyle/DetailAstImpl.java#L170-L172 I found this to be a common stopping point when pausing execution. We have to manually find the end of the link chain when adding a child. It will...