Richard North

I agree we should look into this - the JUnit4 support allowed parallel containers from the beginning, but unfortunately this wasn’t as easy for JUnit5. We should look into this...

Agreed. We'd happily accept a PR for this, if anyone wants to speed this up.

Thanks for the contribution @raminqaf I think one thing we need to be _really_ careful about is the breaking-change nature of this. Is there no way at all to make...

What if we kept it in the same module, but have a `InfluxDBContainerV2` class? We could also rename the current class to `InfluxDBContainerV1` and have a `@Deprecated class InfluxDBContainer extends...

Heads up, running `./gradlew check` locally I'm getting this Javadoc error: ``` /Users/rnorth/github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-java/modules/influxdb/build/delombok/org/testcontainers/containers/InfluxDBContainerV2.java:60: error: element not closed: a * ^ 1 error 3 warnings ``` I think this will show...

I think I'd echo that; if you can, then programmatically creating the container object and passing its connection URL to your code under test is the way that gives the...

I agree, up until > say it is the responsibility of the Testcontainers user to create their specific application user with limited rights and use it accordingly for the actual...

I think @kiview is right - this will be down to permissions on the volume mounted configuration. The right long-term solution has to be to change the container code to...

Hi @ClaudenirFreitas Thank you for your kind submission. It looks like you've put a lot of care and effort into this, and we're always grateful when contributors try to construct...

I seem to trigger this quite frequently when I double-click any text in a code editor (e.g. to select a word). For me, the following repro steps seem pretty reliable:...