Rintze M. Zelle, PhD
Rintze M. Zelle, PhD
In the CMoS example, the institution is treated as a publisher, not as an author. Together with the precedent for the _report_ item type, which already has the "Institution"/**institution** field...
Is there really a demand for this? If not, I'd rather leave things be for now.
See also http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/8503/any-way-to-change-bibtex-keys/?Focus=39623#Comment_39623 and https://www.zotero.org/trac/ticket/763
I just noticed that datacite.org has started to offer citeproc JSON, but they use (the invalid) "misc" as item type, since CSL doesn't have a suitable item-type. See http://datacite.org/node/63
Ignoring the discussion about which fields are needed to handle datasets, is there already enough of a consensus that adding a "dataset" CSL item type is a good idea? @bdarcus...
Couldn't you just use a conditional to test whether "issue" is non-numeric? (for localization, should we also add a "special" or "special issue" term?) For APA, see also http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2012/05/citing-a-special-issue-or-special-section-in-apa-style.html (apparently...
Preferred CSL item type name? "program", "computer_program", "software"? I think I prefer "program".
Is "software" too general? Otherwise I guess we'll go with "computer_program", then.
Fine with me!
While I've been procrastinating for over 4 years now when it comes to working on a new CSL release, I have some good hopes we can rekindle the fire and...