Ryan Shaffer

> The test will not pass until PR [here](https://github.com/amazon-braket/amazon-braket-default-simulator-python/pull/285) is also confirmed and merged to main. The changes in the sdk work only if the [amazon-default-simulator](https://github.com/amazon-braket/amazon-braket-default-simulator-python) is updated Got it,...

> hello @rmshaffer I will fix the code format issues Yes, I see a lot of extraneous formatting changes in this PR - let us know if you need assistance...

@robotastray it's indicating that both branches of the highlighted line are not being hit. To fix that error, you would want tests which cover all branching cases: enter the `if`...

> @rmshaffer the automated tests are checking for `test_measureff_ccprx_from_ir`. the function does not exists in `test/unit_tests/braket/experimental_capabilities/iqm/test_iqm_experimental_capabilities.py` > > you can see the details in line 6376 on this [page](https://github.com/amazon-braket/amazon-braket-sdk-python/actions/runs/16047937791/job/45299412155?pr=1085) @robotastray...

@math411 Could you provide some more background/context on why we want to do this, given that Python 3.9 is not EOL until October 2025?

Closing this PR as it is no longer needed. AutoQASM will be moving to a new repo at https://github.com/amazon-braket/autoqasm.

@nonhermitian we need to get `barrier` added as a supported instruction in the Braket service first, and then we'll merge support for the `barrier` instruction here. Thank you for the...

> Is there any action in this direction anymore? Not having a barrier makes benchmarking via AWS difficult because any mirror circuits collapse unless verbatim mode is used, e.g. [unitaryfoundation/metriq-gym#329](https://github.com/unitaryfoundation/metriq-gym/issues/329)...

Hi @skushagra, yes, this issue is open! Please feel free to start, and let us know if you have any questions.

I personally would choose LaTeX. But you're free to choose!