Roberto Leibman

Any updates on when this is coming in?

I'm using the following, which fits my needs better than a field replacement: ```import spray.json.JsObject import spray.json.JsValue import scala.annotation.tailrec package object util { implicit class PimpedJsObject(obj: JsObject) { def merge(obj2:...

I'm using the following, it fits my needs better than a straight ++ on the fields: ```import spray.json.JsObject import spray.json.JsValue import scala.annotation.tailrec package object util { implicit class PimpedJsObject(obj: JsObject)...

```scala request implicit val decoder: Decoder[MyRequest] = myRequestDecoder(now) (for { json ZIO(r) ) } ``` and yes, I think we're reading it more than once: ```scala final protected def logJsonRequest(req:...

Here's an example of something that would look more like akka's way: ```scala val route: Http[GatewayEnvironment, Throwable, Request, Response] = Http.collectZIO[Request] { case request @ Method.GET -> !! / "list"...

I love how that looks, for the one case where you have a one to one correspondence between endpoint and Query case class, but I'm afraid it would not work...

@travisbrown.... could we have a review? it's been 13 months, please.

@zmccoy, @zarthross? Or who owns this repo now?

I believe that fixes it (at least in my environment, a recent stock centos 7 installation)

I'm seeing the exact same thing on the latest version 0.2.0