Reid

@RichardWallis thanks for the reply. I'm not sure if making ManufacturingOrganization a subclass of LocalBusiness makes sense. I'm looking through the the different subclasses of LocalBusiness and seeing things like...

> Hence the recommendation to make it a LocalBusiness subtype. But a large company like Toyota wouldn't fall under LocalBusiness, would it?

Quick update -- I've added two new properties to ManufacturingService: - productionVolume: [link](http://mfg.sdo-mfg.appspot.com/productionVolume) - mfgMaterial: [link](http://mfg.sdo-mfg.appspot.com/mfgMaterial) I also created a [VolumeLevel](http://mfg.sdo-mfg.appspot.com/VolumeLevel) type, which is a subclass of enumeration and has...

New additions: - Industry (subclass of Intangible): [link](http://mfg.sdo-mfg.appspot.com/Industry) - anzsic (property of Industry): [link](http://mfg.sdo-mfg.appspot.com/anzsic) - gics (property of Industry): [link](http://mfg.sdo-mfg.appspot.com/gics) - icb (property of Industry): [link](http://mfg.sdo-mfg.appspot.com/icb) - nace (property of...

@mfhepp Yes, those two industry classification codes already exist which is why I didn't redefine them. I simply added the new Industry class to their domain. You may be right...

While we certainly may add terms in the future to our extension, what exactly do we need to do at this point to get the current mfg terms officially merged...

@RichardWallis @vholland @thadguidry @danbri I've updated the original post with the current terms. - The 'marketServed' property has been removed (the core 'areaServed' property is sufficient). - The 'hasProduct' property...