rixo

Hmm... I wanted to avoid rendering user provided content (views) in iframes but this may be unavoidable to avoid problems like this. I've already experimented with rendering the whole Svench...

Yes, indeed, I hadn't thought this through. After my failed expedition in shadow DOM territory, I told myself Svelte CSS scoping should be enough in the great majority of cases....

@dipscom You sure? There might be something left to track / plan here.

Hey guys! We're not there yet, but I have started to explore what would be needed for Kit support. Eventually I'd want this to be fully automatic, but for now...

@jwrunner Yes indeed, thanks. I fixed my example above. Digging this a little more, I see that nicely mocking a Kit app's context will also be one of the challenges...

@jwrunner This is fixed in latest (which was more recent than next currently... I remove the next tag from npm to avoid confusion): ~~~bash pnpm add -D svench vite @sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte...

Hey! Just wanna let you know that I was able to reproduce your problem with the provided example, but I haven't been able to pinpoint it yet. I don't think...

I think that's due to recent changes of strategy for automating Vite's optimizeDeps, in `@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte` (and yes, indeed, that's the plugin to use now; the @svitejs one is not supported...

This should be fixed in 0.2.0-31. Can you confirm? > Meanwhile, have you seen that Storybook now offers much better Svelte support? The competition is getting fierce! ;-) Are they...

Quota exceeded? This is a localStorage error, isn't it? Svench doesn't put so much in localStorage :thinking: Do you get that on any browser? Or what browser?