Roman Ivantsov

@bbakerman - 100% agree. This was one of the points of my presentation on GraphQL issues at the end of June meeting - to make introspection equivalent to SDL file,...

+1 for the idea; but sample case is not good IMHO

I do not quite understand the purpose and benefits. The whole reasoning is based on these 'requirements', which are quite questionable. Like number 4: > 4. Item slots should not...

Just a question. About proper English: > When more than one field of the same response name is executed ... is it plural or singular?! fields are many, so it's...

yeah, that feels weird, and that's what pushed me to switch to 'multiple fields' in the first place; non-ambiguous PLURAL

Regarding using 'response name'. There are 4 occurrences in the spec of 'response name', none of them defines it, only use it as already known. There is a term 'response...

Opened a discussion of some considerations related to this issue: https://github.com/graphql/graphql-wg/discussions/860

### NonEmpty lists. Easily solved by a NonEmpty directive and does not require new syntax or new concepts. The directive does not need to be 'standard', defined in spec; a...

@benjie - and that's the problem with introspection, we already discussed this briefly; and that SHOULD be fixed anyway, and SDL file and Introspection set should become one and the...

@benjie I do not quite get it, your sample, the last query with Foo. The situation is impossible, we never find object C there. And I think deep enough and...