Steven Rieder
Steven Rieder
to me, it looks like a difference in a random number generator rather than precision, maybe.
bash or any posix shell
The only workaround I can think of is to replay the stellar evolution history completely, which wouldn't be great... I'm hoping there's a better alternative. Any suggestions @spzwart, @silviatoonen?
Thanks. For now, I'm dealing with single stars so I can use this workaround. But it would be great if it were possible to resume a calculation - at some...
> For now in SeBa, this is the only option. However, if all your stars are single stars (no binaries), it should take little computational efforts to jump to any...
This would be especially of importance when at some point I include binary stars in my simulations, of course.
Great! I’ll see if I can add the necessary functions for this.
Related question, while I am at it: is it possible to have individual metallicities for the stars? That's currently not allowed by the AMUSE interface but I don't see why...
(it looks possible so I will include this in my updates)
cool. I think it's easiest to add optional parameters to `addstar` in SeBa, since you'd only want to set these when adding a star. I'll submit a PR to SeBa.