Rich Lander

Results 284 comments of Rich Lander

We are currently considering this design proposal. https://github.com/dotnet/designs/pull/260 I don't think we can reasonably back-port it to .NET 6, however. Can you share more context? Are you the maintainers for...

I was thinking more about this (based on our continuing conversations on RID simplification). Is the RID for anolis needed for restoring anolis-specific packages or just to ensure that anolis...

This info might be what you are looking for: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/50818 We have a maintainers group now. I can add you if you want to join it @geliwei. The new plan...

Ideally, we would not and this RID could be added via source-build per https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/50818. That should be the goto approach for these cases. Is that acceptable?

Here's my take/understanding on how the system should work. - Everyone should publish portable linux binaries (for packages) as a general rule. - If they cannot, then they limit the...

@clairernovotny @aortiz-msft It would be good for the NuGet team to review this approach.

Excellent question. We actually looked at the `manylinux` solution. See my comment: https://github.com/dotnet/core/pull/7437#issuecomment-1121236518. Our plan is to do something very similar, except we already have infrastructure that allows us the...

What does rootfs targeting look like with containers? The rootfs instructions I have seen have all been oriented on bare metal. Does it work the same in containers? I think...

Cool. Maybe that will work. It's a question of whether we can acquire the desired rootfs. I'd look to @omajid for that. Got a link to a Dockerfile that does...

I'm likely missing something basic. I was thinking that cloaking would be oriented on source not binaries. Can you describe the flow, both leading up to and including the cloaking?