Rich FitzJohn
Rich FitzJohn
In theory, this would be fine (I think that this sort of approach is common in cmake, right?). It's a bit weird here because only _some_ targets create files, and...
For some reason I don't see notifications on pull requests via email. You'd think that I would. Don't worry about the failing check; it's appveyor for reasons that I don't...
So, at the moment there is a `check:` option for targets, with an option `"exists"`. That would seem to be the sensible place to put this sort of alternative. It...
Can we get a test on this perhaps? This sort of testing is a total pain --- you'll probably have to run in a temporary directory like so: ``` r...
Also, possible things to add after dealing with the above (could be a subsequent PR if you'd rather) - Support for a vector of packages, sources to propagate the appropriate...
Hola @aammd - any interest in picking this up again?
For files, storr won't care. It's a different matter when storing _objects_ as those will always be hashed on write, but then they're also essentially guaranteed not to be modified...
See also #2; this is on the list but mostly blocked by a lack of time and a really good UI for it. Some sort of pattern matching approach is...
:cry: :link: :broken_heart:
I am torn on this one - like `sapply` it has this appeal that I worry has a dark side. Also `yaml` validation is so unpleasant as it it is....