RcppR6
RcppR6 copied to clipboard
richfitz
Code-generation wrapping C++ classes as R6 classes
hi, possibly a similar motivation as #9, what do you think about native construction of the `R6` objects? i currently have the issue that the construction of `R6` objects is...
Hi! thanks for your work. I have question (probably dummy). Do we have any workaround when we want to expose multiple constructors?
Allow creation of functions that create or use (or both) templated types. This used to work but I got rid of it, and now I need it back. There are...
For the case where the a class is templated on `T` and the constructor has args `[name: T]` then we should be able to dispatch on the class of T...
(a package `foo` can't have a class `foo` because it will collide with the namespace) Not sure if this is a problem.
Ideally something also that checks for missing parameters, though that's an extension to the spec. Simplest route would be to wrap [mstch](https://github.com/no1msd/mstch) or [plustache](https://github.com/mrtazz/plustache) as they're likely to be significantly...
Instead of doing the if/else in R and having two C++ functions, do the if/else in C++ and pass along either something to indicate missing (3rd arg as logical result...
Since 0.11.5: > ``` > * The XPtr class was extended with new checked_get and release > functions as well as improved behavior (throw an exception > rather than crash)...