Richard Werkman

/azp run

 It looks like we no longer include the comment into the mutation. Closing the issue

I can't seem to reproduce this issue anymore. Please reopen if another reproduction is found.

> it will result in surviving mutant due to timeout ... This is not true, timeouts are counted as killed when calculating the mutation score. So why would you want...

I'd like to see at least a few test cases in `CsharpMutantOrchestratorTests` that show the mutation is placed as expected. Especially the `Trim()` and `SubString()` mutations could be placed in...

A good test would also be to add this line to the integration test project: `"test".ToUpper().Trim().PadLeft(2).Substring(2).ElementAt(2);` that would make sure everything compiles like expected.

If we do this we should also look into disconnecting versions of our packages. Right now dotnet-stryker and stryker are kept at the same version. But we only track semantic...

The specifics of the implementation are: we don't have an implementation... I wanted to add that but so far without success. For now, we place these mutations all the time....

I've created an issue at stryker-net for this: https://github.com/stryker-mutator/stryker-net/issues/2367

@Lutti1988 is this still an issue in the latest version?