richardwan
richardwan
the "hasProperty" matcher lets you convert from `__.assertThat('hello'.length, __.greaterThan(3))` to `assertThat('hello', hasProperty('length', __.greaterThan(3))` can we extend this idea to arbitrary functions? so instead of writing `__.assertThat(element.querySelector('option').value.length, __.greaterThan(3))` one could write...
introduce syntactic sugar to make the hamjest code look more like jest code. `__.expect(5).toBe(__.greaterThan(4))` would be equivalent to `__.assertThat(5, __.greaterThan(4))` if this would help people familiar with the "jest syntax"...
I have a question (but do not know if the issues are the appropriate place for this). if not passed a block but "lazy" is called, will the objects still...
in order to successfully proxy, i had to do a workaround ``` headers = { 'Host' => host, 'Accept' => request.headers.to_h['HTTP_ACCEPT'] } reverse_proxy "https://#{host}", headers: headers ``` instead of `reverse_proxy...