Richard Light

Hi, these sound like simple XML parsing errors, suggesting that your input is not well-formed XML. Use something like https://www.xmlvalidation.com/, or post it here for me to check.

@petermr where are you looking up these terms? Can't we access a data source that is well-formed XML, e.g. by using an Accept header?

Any scope for using Wikipedia's Linked Data twin dbpedia? (Not sure from the above exactly what you are searching for.)

Then why are you searching in Wikipedia?

OK, well the advantage of dbpedia is that you can put SPARQL queries to it, and get back machine-processible responses. Of course, it may not have the content you are...

Wikidata is a separate exercise (with its own problems of data consistency). My point is that dbpedia is in lockstep with (= is automatically extracted from) Wikipedia, so if you're...

Peter, please re-read my comments, noting that I am simply trying to address the problems reported above that Wikipedia responses are not processible. I am _not_ suggesting replacing WD by...

We would be happy with a set of simple SKOS-like mappings. I can understand your wanting to improve on SKOS with regard to the metadata/contextual data associated with mappings, but...

Thank you, that gives me a clear idea of what our options are.