Ricardo Vieira
Ricardo Vieira
> Hi @ricardoV94, my PR is failing some checks. Can you kindly review and advise? You seem to not have installed/run pre-commit: https://github.com/pymc-devs/pymc/actions/runs/5364577123/jobs/9732853644?pr=6795 Check https://www.pymc.io/projects/docs/en/latest/contributing/pr_tutorial.html for more details
It returns a tuple which is at odds with pytensor shape being a vector... This is used internally so it may need some thinking...
I posed a vague question on the scipy discourse: https://discuss.scientific-python.org/t/several-special-functions-started-upcasting-low-precision-integer-inputs-to-float64-in-v1-14-0/1266
Marked as TODO as I think the ScalarLoop can already be inplaced as well as it uses temporary variables for the inner carry. Just need to add a test.
No docs preview around here @OriolAbril :( ?
Thanks, added the workflow @OriolAbril
1. I think giant branch is just less likely to work because of the last 20% effect. Getting 80% in gradually is already a huge improvement for everyone so I...
So let's take away the default
Also I'm sure there must be more clever DMC samplers. This will update each step at a time, which I can imagine may be suboptimal. At least it updates in...
> Seems like a fine stop-gap change > > Maybe wait for the #361 to merge first then change where the test file is? Sure